due to amendment of the Nationality Act (see also application below to the court in Washington DC)
In 1999 Section 40a was inserted into the Nationality Act, by which all Germans were deprived of the nationality of the Basic Law “Germans within the meaning of Article 116 of the Basic Law” and were thus all declared to be Reich Germans.
This is deception in legal relations! Because all treaties that the German Federal Government concludes and has concluded expressly apply to “Germans within the meaning of Article 116 (1) of the Basic Law”.
This is also quite logical, as the contracting parties, such as the USA or Austria in the double taxation agreement, thereby ensure that the FRG complies with its national laws and acts in accordance with the rule of law.
Nationality always describes which national law applies to this person and which treaties apply. If the nationality changes, the law that the person can sue for and the treaties from which they can obtain rights also change.

As a result of our publication, this Section 40a was deleted in August 2021 without any debate - a full admission of guilt. But that changes nothing. Section 15 was overwritten instead.
After that, Reich German judges sit in the courts. Only those who had made use of the right to renounce their Reich German nationality were confirmed to have distanced themselves from it.
An Imperial German judge therefore sits on the ICJ. He is asked to state which nationality he has, according to which law, when enacted and which constitution applies to him, with which national law, when enacted.
With these legislative amendments from 1999 and 2021, the government is inciting tax fraud when citizens take advantage of double taxation agreements even though they are no longer “Germans within the meaning of Article 116 (1) of the Basic Law”.

As with the International Court of Justice in The Hague, the International Criminal Court in The Hague is also presided over by a German Reich judge who is not independent and rejects a constitution of the FRG and continues the Second World War, and as the EU meeting in Versailles (and not in Brussels) proves, also rejects the Versailles Treaty, which was intended to end the First World War, and thus continues the First World War. This court is therefore biased, it cannot judge neutrally. Every judge in every state is obliged to ensure that these dependent judges are removed before accepting any case at all. What good is it if judges in the lower courts rule in cases that any higher court can overturn arbitrarily? As long as this is not guaranteed, which is guaranteed to every citizen by UN and EU Human Rights, state judges are not competent! They are committing high treason!