In our book "Tue deine Pflicht" (Do your duty) we have dealt with this in 2009, as well as already in 2007 with our special edition. There you can see copies of examples.
Because we have constantly reminded the missing signatures, the law was adapted to the illegal acts in 2014.
Now once again with a few more §§:
All laws only reveal one thing: the obligation to sign!
Without a signature no one can be held responsible.
This is illustrated by the Görgülü case, which went as far as the European Court of Justice, on account of child abduction. Mr Görgülü was proved right. The European Court of Justice ruled that the entire 2nd Senate of the Naumburg Higher Regional Court had pronounced law against all law. As a result, someone at the Public Prosecutor's Office reported the judges. The Public Prosecutor's Office discontinued the proceedings, because allegedly it could no longer be determined which judge was involved in the judgement...Any more questions?
Judgment of the ECtHR, 26.02.2004 - 74969/01
The copies shall bear authentication. But even these are false. It would have to be certified that the judge or judges signed the original. This is not done. Only the text is certified. In most cases, it is also judicial employees who are bound by instructions and thus dependent on the judge who carry out the authentication. It is pretended that they are officials sworn in by law and therefore personally liable, which says: judicial employees as clerks of the court.
Examples here
In the meantime it has become common practice in Bavaria that instead of the stamp "Landgericht Coburg", "Landgericht Bayern" is used, or Amtsgericht Bayern instead of Amtsgericht Coburg, or Oberlandesgericht Bayern instead of Oberlandesgericht Bamberg.
There is no regional court of Bavaria, or local court of Bavaria, as the Bavarian State Ministry of Justice itself informs the judiciary.
Evidence A1: Order of the Higher Regional Court of Bamberg dated March 29, 2007
three judges - no signature
false authentication by a court clerk
Stamp Bavaria - Higher Regional Court
Continue to: Falsification of court records
The arbitrariness in the FRG
Table of contents:
1. International law with regard to legal, independent and impartial courts
2. Domestic laws of the FRG on legal, independent and impartial courts
3.1 Dependent judges in the FRG
3.1.1 Parliamentary election
3.1.2 Election of judges
3.1.2.1 Statements
3.1.2.2 Appointment of judges by an authority
3.1.2.3 Judges are subject to a political authority in disciplinary proceedings
3.3 Unlawful judges in the FRG
1. Legal provisions
2. The roster allocating court business
4. The consequences of dependent judges
4.1 The missing signatures of these judges
4.1.1 Legal provisions
4.1.2 False authentications
4.1.3 False stamps
4.1.4 Who is liable?
4.2 Falsifying of court records
4.2.1 Legal provisions on keeping minutes
4.2.2 Absence of witness testimonies
4.2.3 The reality in the courtroom and in the court record
4.2.4 Conclusion
4.3 Absence of second instance
4.3.1 Legal provisions
4.3.2 Conclusion - the FRG is not in conformity with EU law
5. Conclusion - the FRG acts as German Reich
Beowulf von Prince
Schweizer Str. 38
AT-6830 Rankweil
Österreich